<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hindu Maidens and Hot Jazz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theomniscientmussel.com/2007/09/hindu-maidens-and-hot-jazz/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theomniscientmussel.com/2007/09/hindu-maidens-and-hot-jazz/</link>
	<description>Classical Music &#38; Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miss Mussel</title>
		<link>http://theomniscientmussel.com/2007/09/hindu-maidens-and-hot-jazz/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Mussel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theomniscientmussel.com/?p=93#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Is anything true if it is relative?  

Also, it seems to Miss Mussel that a totalitarian social contract is the only honest one.  At least you know what you're getting into up front.....there is no illusion of choice dangled like a phony carrot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anything true if it is relative?  </p>
<p>Also, it seems to Miss Mussel that a totalitarian social contract is the only honest one.  At least you know what you&#8217;re getting into up front&#8230;..there is no illusion of choice dangled like a phony carrot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Palmer</title>
		<link>http://theomniscientmussel.com/2007/09/hindu-maidens-and-hot-jazz/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theomniscientmussel.com/?p=93#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Hmm.... how 'bout "true relativistic equality"?
The totalitarian social contract is a suspect one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;. how &#8217;bout &#8220;true relativistic equality&#8221;?<br />
The totalitarian social contract is a suspect one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music &#187; Hindu Maidens and Hot Jazz</title>
		<link>http://theomniscientmussel.com/2007/09/hindu-maidens-and-hot-jazz/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Music &#187; Hindu Maidens and Hot Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theomniscientmussel.com/?p=93#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Foley wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Foley wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Mussel</title>
		<link>http://theomniscientmussel.com/2007/09/hindu-maidens-and-hot-jazz/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Mussel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theomniscientmussel.com/?p=93#comment-34</guid>
		<description>It seems to Miss Mussel that total equality is not possible (and therefore not worth pursuing) because you need like things to have equality and really, unless it is factory produced, no two things are exactly the same, therefore taking them out of the running in the equality race. 

Essentially, it's the  apples and oranges debate.

And, also...when people are brought into the mix, how boring would it be to have everyone be the same?  In this sense, inequality seems like the better solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to Miss Mussel that total equality is not possible (and therefore not worth pursuing) because you need like things to have equality and really, unless it is factory produced, no two things are exactly the same, therefore taking them out of the running in the equality race. </p>
<p>Essentially, it&#8217;s the  apples and oranges debate.</p>
<p>And, also&#8230;when people are brought into the mix, how boring would it be to have everyone be the same?  In this sense, inequality seems like the better solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Palmer</title>
		<link>http://theomniscientmussel.com/2007/09/hindu-maidens-and-hot-jazz/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theomniscientmussel.com/?p=93#comment-32</guid>
		<description>The other category  is "subject". 
Total equality takes time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other category  is &#8220;subject&#8221;.<br />
Total equality takes time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
