How To Win At Blogging Part 2

Chris Clarke dissects the anatomy of a blog post with alarming and hilarious accuracy in Sunday’s Boston Globe.

“This sentence contains the thesis of the blog post, a trite and obvious statement cast as a dazzling and controversial insight.

This sentence claims that there are many people who do not agree with the thesis of the blog post as expressed in the previous sentence. This sentence speculates as to the mental and ethical character of the people mentioned in the previous sentence. This sentence contains a link to the most egregiously ill-argued, intemperate, hateful, and ridiculous example of such people the author could find.

This sentence is a three-word refutation of the post linked in the previous sentence, the first of which three words is “Um.” This sentence implies that the linked post is in fact typical of those who disagree with the thesis of the blog post. This sentence contains expressions of outrage and disbelief largely expressed in Internet acronyms. This sentence contains a link to an Internet video featuring a cat playing a piano.”

[read the rest here]

For How To Win At Blogging Part 1 – head over here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *